Date: Sat, 13 Jan 1996 13:16:03 -0800 From: "Amancio Hasty Jr." <hasty@rah.star-gate.com> To: =?KOI8-R?Q?=E1=CE=C4=D2=C5=CA_=FE=C5=D2=CE=CF=D7?= (aka Andrey A. Chernov, Black Mage) <ache@astral.msk.su> Cc: Gary Palmer <gpalmer@cdrom.com>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: abuse and the -stable linux emu (mknod & mkfifo) Message-ID: <199601132116.NAA06804@rah.star-gate.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 14 Jan 1996 00:00:25 %2B0300." <hCfr1-mea2@ache.dialup.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>>> =?KOI8-R?Q?=E1=CE=C4=D2=C5=CA_=FE=C5=D2=CE=CF=D7?= said: > In message <199601131009.CAA00387@rah.star-gate.com> Amancio Hasty Jr. > writes: > > >and change the mknod call to linux_mknod : > >linux_sysent.c: 3, mknod, /* 14 */ > > to > >linux_sysent.c: 3, linux_mknod, /* 14 */ > > I remember recent discussion for adding mkfifo capabilities > to system mknod (instead of this hack). > Could anybody tell me the result, I miss it... I think it was decided to keep our current mknod implementation. If you like just searched thru the mail archives.. I just want to avoid 20 postings again on mknod 8) BTW: What do I have to do over here so I can read your name in Russian ? Regards, Amancio
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199601132116.NAA06804>