Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 03:52:53 +0900 From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> To: Florent Thoumie <flz@xbsd.org> Cc: Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net>, ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: make.conf no x option Message-ID: <m2ljojelx6.wl%randy@psg.com> In-Reply-To: <a01628140905260545q149622b9xfbde9fab3c49eef4@mail.gmail.com> References: <m2vdnodrq5.wl%randy@psg.com> <20090526113714.GC1043@straylight.m.ringlet.net> <m2r5ycdr6c.wl%randy@psg.com> <20090526120948.GA14134@owl.midgard.homeip.net> <a01628140905260545q149622b9xfbde9fab3c49eef4@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Something like the following would work as a safety net. > > --- /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.xorg.mk.orig 2009-05-26 13:42:52.000000000 +0100 > +++ /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.xorg.mk 2009-05-26 13:42:58.000000000 +0100 > @@ -28,6 +28,11 @@ > # xserver - there's only one atm, I guess everything can fit into the > port itself > > .if defined(XORG_CAT) > + > +. if defined(WITHOUT_X11) > +IGNORE= me not want x11 > +. endif > + > # Default variables, common to all new modular xorg ports. > .if !defined(USE_TGZ) > USE_BZIP2= yes looks useful. i think this whole thing is worth a few days to settle in our heads. essentially, if we believe that freebsd is used extensively in headless server deployments, we should make that easy and smooth. randy
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?m2ljojelx6.wl%randy>