Date: Sat, 22 May 2010 21:40:29 -0700 From: Doug Hardie <bc979@lafn.org> To: Adam Vande More <amvandemore@gmail.com> Cc: FreeBSD Questions <questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: atapicam issues Message-ID: <3C64CABA-150E-4DEE-AEDD-4CC613E6AED1@lafn.org> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTilk01hdsx7iY3K5PoK9Xxx1A85_Om65WJGOfiz3@mail.gmail.com> References: <6D48A7EF-6412-4084-A334-970D3D50A013@lafn.org> <AANLkTinouqUZsWYbBe57pTCyNNFYhToPborySD7pr_iX@mail.gmail.com> <9EA21187-5E9F-4E86-8B82-53EC73DD8410@lafn.org> <AANLkTilk01hdsx7iY3K5PoK9Xxx1A85_Om65WJGOfiz3@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 22 May 2010, at 21:05, Adam Vande More wrote: > On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 11:01 PM, Doug Hardie <bc979@lafn.org> wrote: >=20 > Both machines were installed from the same CD over old Windows = systems. They were installed within a few days of each other. = loader.conf only has "console=3Dcomconsole". Reading through the = handbook page above it indicates that atapicam needs to be loaded in = /boot/loader.conf. I'll add that to both machines. Makes me wonder why = the one worked. kldstat showed it was not loaded. >=20 > Well I assumed the hardware is identical but is it a scsi optical = drive in the one worked? Hardware is fairly identical but not completely. Drives are both IDE. = There are no SCSI cards on either machine.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3C64CABA-150E-4DEE-AEDD-4CC613E6AED1>