Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 14:59:12 -0400 From: Jung-uk Kim <jkim@FreeBSD.org> To: olli hauer <ohauer@gmx.de>, Mathieu Arnold <mat@FreeBSD.org>, Emanuel Haupt <ehaupt@FreeBSD.org> Cc: svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r351864 - head/shells/bash Message-ID: <5356BC00.1060002@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <5356B9AD.8030206@gmx.de> References: <5356B13D.3010600@gmx.de> <05395BF0C295F22BE2319316@atuin.in.mat.cc> <5356B9AD.8030206@gmx.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 2014-04-22 14:49:17 -0400, olli hauer wrote: > On 2014-04-22 20:21, Mathieu Arnold wrote: >> >> >> +--On 22 avril 2014 20:13:17 +0200 olli hauer <ohauer@gmx.de> >> wrote: | Hi Emanuel, | | please check the fdescfs mount notation, >> it looks wrong. | | Possible issues with wrong /etc/fstab entries >> are found mostly during | reboot, but then it is to late ;) >> >> For all pseudofs filesystems, you can put whatever you like as >> the device, it doesn't matter. > > You are right! > > Anyway samples / suggestions in pkg-message should match the man > pages. I believe he copied the message from java/openjdk6 and I wrote it, actually. If you see fdescfs(5) and procfs(5), the former says "fdescfs" and the later says "proc". I didn't want to show an inconsistent example, so I chose the shorter one. Jung-uk Kim -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTVrwAAAoJEHyflib82/FG8LIH+wSNbK46wtlh32Gy2PUBfzHb 1z0GqNWrsREwX2MNalZYqtnp3MGM7pBCktI0AaO8AkQouDdg1LuTcnDbDkeOlDQm ZCc6pA8ZWTo1F4xQpTUQ2leh+up5WEgi8HnsoezEbAYlju+iTLsMsiy5gUYf5duu uu35aVhgHI2fDxm03pKzlkuqMvi2X55XYLut/UBEwK2ahynNfAMKUaQdR1pJhJ/I dYWRrKEVyC0GpD7t5KnM1UPsoVFgbq4PeIJINj3MMPVMRZljfBxYFB7ngFM4yk3P 24kAChmlss1YDF2d0Tz0K2IbHh7kHBjJhechb+qzThhWHVlGMm/nJqjyplOzjK4= =rkSc -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5356BC00.1060002>