Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 10:33:55 +0100 From: Gary Jennejohn <gary.jennejohn@freenet.de> To: Jeff Roberson <jroberson@chesapeake.net> Cc: Attilio Rao <attilio@freebsd.org>, ups@freebsd.org, rwatson@freebsd.org, arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rwlock patch to prefer writers and improve spinning. Message-ID: <20080131103355.30cc5bb0@peedub.jennejohn.org> In-Reply-To: <20080130145548.P957@desktop> References: <20080128190244.R957@desktop> <3bbf2fe10801291201n7b355205o43b648791f5ca387@mail.gmail.com> <20080129143512.M957@desktop> <3bbf2fe10801291659r650ec27eu5c346b1b85118713@mail.gmail.com> <20080130145548.P957@desktop>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 30 Jan 2008 14:56:05 -1000 (HST) Jeff Roberson <jroberson@chesapeake.net> wrote: > On Wed, 30 Jan 2008, Attilio Rao wrote: > >>> Jeff, > >>> it is not missing a kern/subr_witness.c part where some checks are axed out? > >> > >> Oh you are right I forgot to include some turnstile pieces as well. I > >> will provide them soon. > > > > Gah, I meant kern/subr_turnstile.c really :) > > The patch is updated in place at: > > http://people.freebsd.org/~jeff/rwlock.diff > Doesn't apply cleanly against -current updated about 10 minutes ago: Hunk #22 failed at 797. 1 out of 22 hunks failed--saving rejects to kern/kern_rwlock.c.rej I have __FBSDID("$FreeBSD: src/sys/kern/kern_rwlock.c,v 1.34 2008/01/17 20:15:15 jhb Exp $"); Easy enough to apply by hand, but still... --- Gary Jennejohn
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080131103355.30cc5bb0>