Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 15:53:00 +0100 From: VANHULLEBUS Yvan <vanhu@FreeBSD.org> To: Gabe <nrml@att.net> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RE: NAT-T + ipsec integration Message-ID: <20081212145300.GA14254@zeninc.net> In-Reply-To: <20081212135124.115368FC24@mx1.freebsd.org> References: <20081212135124.115368FC24@mx1.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 05:51:31AM -0800, Gabe wrote: > So far so good... Should I be worried that the patch file names have 'test' in them? I can rename them if you want ;-) Patch for FreeBSD6 is stable enough to be used in production and to survive non regression test suite at NETASQ. Patch for FreeBSD7 is used by many people AFAIK, including my own IPsec gates which have tunnels up 24h/7. I called those versions "test" when I put them online because I only checked that they compile before releasing them. They have been much more tested since. Yvan.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20081212145300.GA14254>