Date: Tue, 8 Oct 1996 13:03:46 -0700 (MST) From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> To: jmacd@CS.Berkeley.EDU (Josh MacDonald) Cc: terry@lambert.org, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: I plan to change random() for -current (was Re: rand() and random()) Message-ID: <199610082003.NAA16844@phaeton.artisoft.com> In-Reply-To: <199610081939.MAA20041@paris.CS.Berkeley.EDU> from "Josh MacDonald" at Oct 8, 96 12:39:20 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > For instance, they could use the better rand() function rand48 instead. > > paris-~ % uname -a > SunOS paris.CS. 4.1.3 6 sun4c > paris-~ % cat test.c > int main() > { > > rand48(); > > } > paris-~ % gcc test.c > collect2: ld returned 2 exit status > ld: Undefined symbol > _rand48 > paris-~ % > > FALSE. hecate% cat correctly_written_test.c #include <stdlib.h> int main() { return( (int)drand48()); } hecate% gcc correctly_written_test.c hecate% TRUE Regards, Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199610082003.NAA16844>