Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 30 Oct 2005 15:22:09 -0800
From:      Pete Slagle <freebsd-stable@box559.com>
To:        freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: GENERIC and DEFAULTS
Message-ID:  <436555A1.3010305@box559.com>
In-Reply-To: <4364A727.9090106@gmx.de>
References:  <d8a4930a0510300236x472292bav@mail.gmail.com> <4364A727.9090106@gmx.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> I've seen that 'GENERIC' file has been modified, moving some lines to
>> 'DEFAULTS':
>>
>> device          isa
>>
>> device          mem             # Memory and kernel memory devices    
>> device          io              # I/O device
>>
>> Why?
>> What does it mean? Should we include 'DEFAULTS' in our customized 
>> 'GENERIC'?
>> Or those lines are no more mandatory?
>>
> 
> No, you don't need to include 'DEFAULTS', config(8) will take care of 
> that for you.
> 
> http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200510271713.j9RHDNTo013082
> 
> AFAICT, this was done in order to automatically include devices which 
> are essential in most cases so less experienced users won't accidentally 
> break their systems and later complain that e.g. X doesn't work anymore.

The whole mechanism seems like an obvious POLA violation.  All the more 
so without a note in UPDATING.

Personally, I prefer less automated "help."  In general, it might be 
better to encourage those who need a nanny to run Windows, leaving 
FreeBSD unencumbered for those who don't.  IMHO.




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?436555A1.3010305>