Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 21:42:14 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org> To: Thomas Backman <serenity@exscape.org> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, FreeBSD current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: zfs: Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode Message-ID: <4A71E986.9010800@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <BEC7EB06-3B69-4BBC-B143-409E55C1F3A8@exscape.org> References: <20090727072503.GA52309@jpru.ffm.jpru.de> <4A7048A9.4020507@icyb.net.ua> <52AA86CB-6C06-4370-BA73-CE19175467D0@exscape.org> <4A705299.8060504@icyb.net.ua> <D3491B77-DA5C-4E10-BE1D-D6EF8CFB112E@exscape.org> <4A7054E1.5060402@icyb.net.ua> <5918824D-A67C-43E6-8685-7B72A52B9CAE@exscape.org> <4A705E50.8070307@icyb.net.ua> <4A70728C.7020004@freebsd.org> <6D47A34B-0753-4CED-BF3D-C505B37748FC@exscape.org> <4A708455.5070304@freebsd.org> <86983A55-E5C4-4C04-A4C7-0AE9A9EE37A3@exscape.org> <4A718E03.6030909@freebsd.org> <71A038EC-02B1-4606-96C2-5E84BE80F005@exscape.org> <4A719CA4.4060400@freebsd.org> <19347561-3CE6-40B3-930A-EB9925D3AFD1@exscape.org> <4A71AD29.10705@freebsd.org> <7544AED1-1216-4A24-B287-F54117641F76@exscape.org> <4 A71B239.8060007@freebsd.org> <3AA3C1CB-CEF7-46CC-A9C7-1648093D679E@exsca! pe.org> <4A71BED8.7050300@freebsd.org> <C7FEDA88-7A89-45DB-BD16-4C8816D17E0D@exscape.org> <BEC7EB06-3B69-4BBC-B143-409E55C1F3A8@exscape.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
on 30/07/2009 21:29 Thomas Backman said the following: > > Unfortunately, I'm not sure I can reproduce this reliably, since it > worked a bunch of times both before and after my previous mail. > > Oh, and I'm still using -DDEBUG=1 and DEBUG_VFS_LOCKS... If this isn't a > new panic because of the changes, perhaps it was triggered now and never > before because of the -DDEBUG? Thomas, I am going on vacation, so no help from me for the next two weeks. Yes, if you get a panic in ASSERT in zfs code, then it's caught because of DEBUG=1. I can't say if you would get a different panic further on if DEBUG weren't enabled. Maybe Pawel can say if this ASSERT is a correct one (I've seen in the past some incorrect asserts, but not in ZFS code). -- Andriy Gapon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4A71E986.9010800>