Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 12:46:58 +0200 From: Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mardorf@rocketmail.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Two pf questions Message-ID: <20170329124658.54191574@moonstudio> In-Reply-To: <20170329121519.64b1d778@moonstudio> References: <CAPORhP4JA_Jak7fL8Ko7wwoxGob=qLDzPLxtTgekoumqQJEGmA@mail.gmail.com> <20170327170941.59c84eec@archlinux.localdomain> <20170327171959.405bbfbb@archlinux.localdomain> <CALfReyfFyj9Gh1Yy%2BzxWH1kAgq%2BkVAGPpjG92keGWAaoMLNSQg@mail.gmail.com> <20170328111655.121ede18@archlinux.localdomain> <20170328111959.400d4761@archlinux.localdomain> <20170328113501.2a5ebf60@archlinux.localdomain> <20170328114541.0ca0d084@archlinux.localdomain> <CAPORhP6BgEoFSbBX_t4h2DwWaG=10nr06isB80cHA3faRCR0Zg@mail.gmail.com> <20170328202936.74ed1741@archlinux.localdomain> <1490755142.1981.82.camel@au.dyndns.ws> <20170329121519.64b1d778@moonstudio>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 29 Mar 2017 12:15:19 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: >On Wed, 29 Mar 2017 13:09:02 +1030, Wayne Sierke wrote: >>Is there any reason that mktemp(1) is not adequate here, or not >>desireable? > > >Since portability isn't a concern I don't think there is a reason, I >just wasn't aware of http://www.unix.com/man-page/FreeBSD/1/mktemp/. There seems to be not really an issue regarding portability, apart from me typing "mktmp" instead of "mktemp".
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20170329124658.54191574>