Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2001 21:38:43 +0200 From: Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai <asmodai@wxs.nl> To: Matthew Jacob <mjacob@feral.com> Cc: Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu>, arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 64 bit times revisited.. Message-ID: <20011026213843.J96876@daemon.ninth-circle.org> In-Reply-To: <20011026100750.H68844-100000@wonky.feral.com> References: <p05101019b7ff461ad2b8@[128.113.24.47]> <20011026100750.H68844-100000@wonky.feral.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-On [20011026 19:20], Matthew Jacob (mjacob@feral.com) wrote: >I would expect Intel to in fact *not* push IA-64 for desktop machines- at >least not for several years. Maybe Intel won't push it, but having DEC, nay, Compaq, nay, HP boxen and we need to keep expanding/replacing gear like this we have little choice BUT moving to IA-64. -- Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven/Asmodai asmodai@[wxs.nl|freebsd.org|xmach.org] Documentation nutter/C-rated Coder, finger asmodai@ninth-circle.dnsalias.net http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/developers-handbook/ When you are right, you cannot be too radical; When you are wrong, you cannot be too conservative. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011026213843.J96876>