Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2020 12:33:42 -0400 From: Greg Veldman <freebsd@gregv.net> To: "Julian H. Stacey" <jhs@berklix.com> Cc: Maintainer of FreeBSD Mailman <mandree@freebsd.org>, Chris <portmaster@bsdforge.com>, FreeBSD Ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: mail/mailman v3? Message-ID: <20200429163342.GU1068@aurora.gregv.net> In-Reply-To: <202004291500.03TF01F4049616@fire.js.berklix.net> References: <20200429024336.GT1068@aurora.gregv.net> <202004291500.03TF01F4049616@fire.js.berklix.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 05:00:01PM +0200, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > Even if it's possible to bend ports/mail/mailman to support Mailman3 > Please do not do it; keep it clean for just Mailman2 > (Else it would cause big run time problems for user admins (inc. me)). > > Any who will want Mailman3 should please clone ports/mail/mailman to > ports/mail/mailman3 (not ports/mail/mailman2) & work there. Thanks There is not yet a port for Mailman3, but the one that is in progress looks like it will go into mail/mailman3 when complete. https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225543 This should not cause any conflicts for Mailman2 users. -- Greg Veldman freebsd@gregv.net
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20200429163342.GU1068>