Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 20 Jun 2017 20:22:17 +0200
From:      Emmanuel Vadot <manu@bidouilliste.com>
To:        Joel Dahl <joel@vnode.se>
Cc:        Michael Gmelin <freebsd@grem.de>, Jeremie Le Hen <jlh@freebsd.org>, Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org>, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: rtools were deemed almost unused 15 years ago...
Message-ID:  <20170620202217.8ddf0bae0d3dbe7063549006@bidouilliste.com>
In-Reply-To: <20170620171744.GA72667@ymer.vnode.se>
References:  <CAGSa5y3kVajpSSJUT9Vt0-dTwtaXMwNWvv_ELH14z68osM0UYA@mail.gmail.com> <20170620111136.fz5ovfa4imm3p4hj@ivaldir.net> <20170620155954.150dedc5@bsd64.grem.de> <20170620171744.GA72667@ymer.vnode.se>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 20 Jun 2017 19:17:44 +0200
Joel Dahl <joel@vnode.se> wrote:

> On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 03:59:54PM +0200, Michael Gmelin wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > On Tue, 20 Jun 2017 13:11:37 +0200
> > Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 12:25:46PM +0200, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
> > > > Hey folks,
> > > > 
> > > > I remember when I was still barely out of my teenagehood, people
> > > > were mostly using ssh/scp while rtools (rsh, rlogin, ... for the
> > > > youngsters) were left in place as a courtesy for legacy production
> > > > systems still relying it on them.
> > > > 
> > > > Fast forward to 2017 (so yes, 15 years later), stack-clash [1]
> > > > sorely reminds us that suid binaries are an attack surface. I don't
> > > > even need to mention that it's a healthy engineering practice to
> > > > remove unused code, both from a maintenance and security
> > > > perspective.
> > > > 
> > > > Therefore, I hereby propose to remove rtools from the base system.
> > > > I acknowledge this will likely cause troubles for a handful of
> > > > people who are still relying on it for good or bad reasons. But the
> > > > flipside is that the attack surface of millions of FreeBSD
> > > > installed out there will be reduced.
> > > > 
> > > > The proposed roadmap is:
> > > > - disable from the build on head and let it soak for one month
> > > > - remove rtools from the base.
> > > > 
> > > > What do you guys think?  Any preferred color for the bikeshed? :)
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > [1] https://www.qualys.com/2017/06/19/stack-clash/stack-clash.txt  
> > > 
> > > Yeah!
> > > 
> > > Is telnetd part of your list?
> > 
> > As long as the telnet(1) client stays in I'm all for it.
> 
> +1. Please keep the telnet client. It's something I expect be part of the base
> system utilities. I use it all the time.
> 
> -- 
> Joel

 Time to learn nc(1), I'm still fighting to use nc(1) insteal of telnet
(1) because of musle memory but removing it will help me make the
switch.

 I honestly don't see any valid reason to keep telnet in the tree.

-- 
Emmanuel Vadot <manu@bidouilliste.com> <manu@freebsd.org>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20170620202217.8ddf0bae0d3dbe7063549006>