Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2022 07:37:48 -0800 From: bob prohaska <fbsd@www.zefox.net> To: Mark Millard <marklmi@yahoo.com> Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org, bob prohaska <fbsd@www.zefox.net> Subject: Re: Panic while making buildlernel on RPi3 Message-ID: <20220305153748.GA24413@www.zefox.net> In-Reply-To: <F1499C1E-4959-434A-A114-4B0496C2429A@yahoo.com> References: <20220304214836.GA21411@www.zefox.net> <E30ECA49-14A0-49A1-9B36-BE25FD646CBF@yahoo.com> <29044F99-661A-4C75-9493-28857DAB963F@yahoo.com> <20220305043002.GB21411@www.zefox.net> <F1499C1E-4959-434A-A114-4B0496C2429A@yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Mar 04, 2022 at 10:51:00PM -0800, Mark Millard wrote: > On 2022-Mar-4, at 20:30, bob prohaska <fbsd@www.zefox.net> wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 04, 2022 at 05:36:20PM -0800, Mark Millard wrote: > > Are you going to do the official-builds-on-microsd-card > sorts of boot and try tests that I've suggested, such as a > 13.1-PRERELEASE (snapshot) test? (This avoids your having > built anything tested and all but whatever minimal > configuration that you need to do to allow the test.) > Yes, after stable/13 settles down a bit. This failure was on -current. > Getting a failure from such an installation of official > installation materials might be more likely to lead to > getting help isolating the issue. Understood. At this point I have two RPI3 systems which exhibit the same problem (faulty ping response). One has followed stable/13 (which had the clang errors you helped with), the other has tracked -current. > [Back to the Subject line's issue . . .] > > > I've been using -DWITH_META_MODE as a default setting for buildworld and > > buildkernel. Might this be part of my problems with the Pi3's ? > > NO_CLEAN is more likely to have the result messed up: it > does less dependency checking and can miss more that should > be rebuilt/relinked. > > WITH_META_MODE is likely to rebuild more than NO_CLEAN, and > so, less likely to include stale material. > > Without special knowledge of the details of what all needs to > be rebuilt at the time, WITH_META_MODE is normally safer. I note with interest that you say "safer", not safe. How do the various cleaning targets described in the build manpage compare? There's clean, cleandir and cleandepend, along with rm -rf /usr/obj. It appears cleandir run twice is equivalant to combined clean and rm -rf /usr/obj. I've not tried cleandepend yet, might it help? It sounds like an occasional clean start buildworld/buildkernel would reduce uncertainty, if not problems. Thanks very much for writing! bob prohaska
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20220305153748.GA24413>