Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2018 12:50:11 +0700 From: Eugene Grosbein <eugen@grosbein.net> To: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: David Cross <dcrosstech@gmail.com>, "Rodney W. Grimes" <freebsd-rwg@pdx.rh.cn85.dnsmgr.net>, FreeBSD Hackers <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Request for comments, new geom part type alias: freebsd-geom Message-ID: <5B5EA713.1000007@grosbein.net> In-Reply-To: <CANCZdfoYUq4iSASpQmF34_0f66iWCbD=w6UNqFnQVgA8eWJHtg@mail.gmail.com> References: <201807292102.w6TL2Cq4062739@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> <144DA23D-26CF-4293-AE97-54CC8D6B52E3@gmail.com> <5B5EA213.9090006@grosbein.net> <CANCZdfoYUq4iSASpQmF34_0f66iWCbD=w6UNqFnQVgA8eWJHtg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
30.07.2018 12:42, Warner Losh wrote: > No. They don't. There is no standard way to mark something unbootable... Then a code in the boot area of our non-bootable partitions should prevent meaningless boot attempts preferably skipping to next partition or drive like our boot0 can.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5B5EA713.1000007>