Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2014 14:00:25 +0400 From: Dmitry Marakasov <amdmi3@amdmi3.ru> To: Tijl Coosemans <tijl@FreeBSD.org> Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r366349 - head/archivers/rpm4 Message-ID: <20140829100025.GQ55025@hades.panopticon> In-Reply-To: <20140828142822.73c5cef4@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> References: <201408272042.s7RKgFqF074882@svn.freebsd.org> <20140828101134.6f7b01ee@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <20140828102214.GH34677@hades.panopticon> <20140828142822.73c5cef4@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Tijl Coosemans (tijl@FreeBSD.org) wrote: > Does it test with a non-default prefix maybe? Because these directories > really are in lang/python27/pkg-plist. It would at least have to be > dirrmtry here, because other ports install files in those directories. Strange, poudriere doesn't complain on these any more (no, I haven't used non-default prefix). So I've removed them. And yes, @dirrmtry should've been used here. Regarding directories shared by multiple ports, I still don't have clear understanding: on one hand, if a directory is managed by dependency, it shouldn't appear in the port plist. On the other hand, if a port is installed with non-default prefix, it should manage all dirs it uses on its own. I probably would prefer the latter as it's more flexible and less error prone (what if dependent ports plist change and directory is no longer shared). -- Dmitry Marakasov . 55B5 0596 FF1E 8D84 5F56 9510 D35A 80DD F9D2 F77D amdmi3@amdmi3.ru ..: jabber: amdmi3@jabber.ru http://www.amdmi3.ru
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140829100025.GQ55025>