Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2016 20:05:49 +0200 (CEST) From: sthaug@nethelp.no To: sodynet1@gmail.com Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Status of MPLS in FreeBSD Message-ID: <20160404.200549.74712229.sthaug@nethelp.no> In-Reply-To: <CAEW%2BogYo5gak0zSDQ%2BydM3sOV_51oA-f2QK3UCdrsoAxLFgVjA@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAEW%2BogYic-pyOxO6N1VM4op5SxvXS4SRkJL7BvMsx8mhoV0yAA@mail.gmail.com> <CAEW%2BogaarfZA7T19sUPrkTdfycCbSRjet-8b4vvjuLXG7w4oSg@mail.gmail.com> <CAEW%2BogYo5gak0zSDQ%2BydM3sOV_51oA-f2QK3UCdrsoAxLFgVjA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Silence means dead project? even the mpls site is dead :( > > linux and openbsd best choices for mpls implementation right now? I'd probably say Juniper and Cisco myself :-) MPLS in FreeBSD is only going to happen if there is sufficient interest *and* coding resources. Somebody needs to do the work. Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug@nethelp.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20160404.200549.74712229.sthaug>