Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2007 21:46:49 +0300 From: Andrew Pantyukhin <infofarmer@FreeBSD.org> To: Ricardo Nabinger Sanchez <rnsanchez@wait4.org> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: substitutions in pkg-plist Message-ID: <20071101184628.GA20862@amilo.cenkes.org> In-Reply-To: <20071030182314.2c0cca7b.rnsanchez@wait4.org> References: <20071030175348.47c6e060.rnsanchez@wait4.org> <20071030182314.2c0cca7b.rnsanchez@wait4.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 06:23:14PM -0200, Ricardo Nabinger Sanchez wrote: > On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 17:53:48 -0200 > Ricardo Nabinger Sanchez <rnsanchez@wait4.org> wrote: > > > This works, but it is not clear why %%whatever%% macros fail silently. > > The point is not exactly "fail silently", but why the %D prefixing is > explicitly necessary? A single path alone on a line is a shorthand for %D/path. In case of @exec, @unexec, @cwd and other commands there is no such shorthand.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20071101184628.GA20862>