Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2017 18:54:30 +0100 From: Jan Beich <jbeich@FreeBSD.org> To: Oliver Schonrock <oliver@schonrocks.com> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: details of beefy12 poudriere jail pkg build environments Message-ID: <wp26-qqp5-wny@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <6f1ba3c7-142b-b0e9-3922-20b6cf1c08c5@schonrocks.com> (Oliver Schonrock's message of "Fri, 1 Dec 2017 17:42:07 %2B0000") References: <6f1ba3c7-142b-b0e9-3922-20b6cf1c08c5@schonrocks.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Oliver Schonrock <oliver@schonrocks.com> writes: > I suspect that the package I get from beefy12 in this build: > > https://pkg-status.freebsd.org/builds/default:default:head-amd64:p455158_s326378:beefy12 > > was built in a jail with clang < 4.0.0 (ie FreeBSD 11, not 11.1 or > stable). My local machine is FreeBSD 11.1-RELEASE with clang = 4.0.0. Why do you use 12.0-CURRENT packages on 11.1-RELEASE? http://beefy12.nyi.freebsd.org/data/head-amd64-default/p455158_s326378/logs/node8-8.9.1_1.log contains 'llvm_version': '5.0', http://beefy9.nyi.freebsd.org/data/110amd64-default/455158/logs/node8-8.9.1_1.log contains 'llvm_version': '3.8',
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?wp26-qqp5-wny>