Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 28 Nov 2011 21:34:01 -0600
From:      Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>
To:        cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org
Cc:        Michael Scheidell <scheidell@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: ports/net-mgmt/flow-tools Makefile
Message-ID:  <20111129033401.GA11234@lonesome.com>
In-Reply-To: <20111129014942.GB3706@magic.hamla.org>
References:  <201111281622.pASGMV6L052569@repoman.freebsd.org> <20111129014942.GB3706@magic.hamla.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 08:49:42PM -0500, Sahil Tandon wrote:
> >   Submitted by:   fw@moov.de
> >   Reviewed by:    scheidell
> >   Approved by:    maintainer (fw@moov.de, timeout), gabor (mentor)
> 
> What is the rationale for placing the submitter's name in the maintainer
> timeout 'Approved by:' tag? 

fwiw, portsmon looks for "maintainer.timeout" to help it track such
things, so I'd prefer to see "fw@moov.de (maintainer timeout)".

It's just advisory, of course, but every little bit helps.

Thanks.

mcl



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20111129033401.GA11234>