Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 25 Mar 1997 17:08:27 -0800
From:      Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com>
To:        "Jonathan M. Bresler" <jmb@freefall.freebsd.org>
Cc:        terry@lambert.org (Terry Lambert), jfieber@indiana.edu, langfod@dihelix.com, hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Cool Web page interface to mail + search engine? 
Message-ID:  <199703260108.RAA15457@rah.star-gate.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 25 Mar 1997 16:58:09 PST." <199703260058.QAA27769@freefall.freebsd.org> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
It is just a distraction from Terry for now just ignore it and
concentrate on the real project .

	Amancio

>From The Desk Of "Jonathan M. Bresler" :
> Terry Lambert wrote:
> > 
> > How can I reply to a message with a date stamp earlier than the
> > original message?
> > 
> > It seems to me that threading would be implicit.
> 
> 	ordering != threading
> 	ordering is less restrictive relationship
> 
> 	has anything useful come out of this thread?
> 
> 	well, i checked rfc822, 1122 and 1123,  Message-ID header
> 	is not required.  if not presendt, the sendmail on freefall
> 	will add it.  same is true of the date.  (in reality these
> 	depend upon the M and D flags for the mailer, but all 
> 	mailers on freefall have these flags set)
> 
> 	regarding the Message-ID header, Bryan Costales writes:
> 	"This header must be declared in the configuration file."
> 	wonder where this requirement is laid down?
> jmb





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199703260108.RAA15457>