Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2000 15:02:25 +0200 From: Christoph Sold <so@server.i-clue.de> To: Christoph Kukulies <kuku@gilberto.physik.RWTH-Aachen.DE> Cc: Christoph Sold <so@server.ms-agentur.de>, questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 4.0 RELEASE - why inof@clausthal? Message-ID: <394E19E1.E471DD6E@i-clue.de> References: <200006191112.NAA01362@gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de> <394E0C8D.4DCBB3EC@i-clue.de> <20000619141215.A4202@gil.physik.rwth-aachen.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Christoph Kukulies wrote: > On Mon, Jun 19, 2000 at 02:05:34PM +0200, Christoph Sold wrote: > > > > > > Christoph Kukulies wrote: > > > > > I installed 4.0-RELEASE as an upgrade (to a 3.4 system). > > > > > > Why are the files stamped Mar 22 instead Mar 20 as the release > > > is on ftp.freebsd.org and why does the booted > > > kernel identify as built by info@clausthal.de (or something)? > > > > Because you bought the distribution created by J.F.Lehmanns, not from > > Walnut Creek. > > Nah. I didn't buy anything :-) > > Actually I don't like it not getting the original from something > that is called 'mirror'. > > And I believe to recall that I downloaded the floppies > from ftp.freebsd.org (not sure though). Maybe it's more efficient to compile locally than to mirror the binaries, too? HTH -Christoph Sold To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?394E19E1.E471DD6E>