Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 10:36:57 -0500 From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <n@nectar.com> To: Dan Langille <dan@langille.org> Cc: Johann Visagie <johann@egenetics.com>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/biology/p5-bioperl-devel Makefile ports/biology/p5-bioperl-devel/files Makefile.man Message-ID: <20010820103657.D74106@madman.nectar.com> In-Reply-To: <3B80F0F1.3282.57FA006@localhost>; from dan@langille.org on Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 11:13:53AM -0400 References: <3B80D46A.3260.51031F7@localhost>; <20010820161028.G67741@fling.sanbi.ac.za> <3B80F0F1.3282.57FA006@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 11:13:53AM -0400, Dan Langille wrote: > > No particular reason, except that I was copying what was done to > > security/heimdal in this case and didn't engage the brain to think up a > > filename of my own. :-) Which in turn mocked x11/XFree86-4. > > I've used Makefile.inc myself in the past, but I don't think there's a > > particular rule involved here(?) > > OK.... > > [imagine me going to FreshPorts to add Makefile.man to the list of > special files] [snip] > I propose we use Makefile.inc and not put it into files. Anyone > concur? Why does FreshPorts care? If it wants Makefile variable values, it should invoke (or emulate) make. Cheers, -- Jacques Vidrine / n@nectar.com / jvidrine@verio.net / nectar@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010820103657.D74106>