Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 23:35:31 +0100 (CET) From: Blaz Zupan <blaz@si.FreeBSD.org> To: Mathieu Arnold <mat@FreeBSD.org> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/net-mgmt/nagios Makefile distinfo pkg-plist ports/net-mgmt/nagios/files nagios.sh.tmpl patch-Makefile.in patch-base-Makefile.in patch-cgi-Makefile.in patch-configure.in ... Message-ID: <20050214233027.Y91298@titanic.medinet.si> In-Reply-To: <4B7E12DCAB200412F2F21C08@[192.168.1.5]> References: <20050214215250.4FFD416A4CE@hub.freebsd.org> <4B7E12DCAB200412F2F21C08@[192.168.1.5]>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> reading the pointed doc, could you comment on : > | 1. FreeBSD and threads. On FreeBSD there's a native user-level > | implementation of threads called 'pthread' and there's also an optional ... I'm now running 2.0.b2 in production for a couple of days and have not seen the mentioned problems, although I'm not really sure what "heavy I/O load" is in this regard - the box I'm running it on is quite heavily loaded. Even if I would see the problems, I don't have the neccesary knowledge to fix them. If there is any problems with 2.0, users should stick to 1.2. If it turns out that there are too many problems with 2.0 reported by users, we can still repo copy 1.2 to ports/net-mgmt/nagios12 and users with problems can run that. For now, I don't see any need.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050214233027.Y91298>