Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 15:06:06 -0400 From: Vivek Khera <vivek@khera.org> To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: postfix port version numbering -- suggestions wanted Message-ID: <1A15A1DC-9947-11D8-B6E4-000A9578CFCC@khera.org> In-Reply-To: <200404281158.06331.ringworm@inbox.lv> References: <AC962F6D-9940-11D8-B6E4-000A9578CFCC@khera.org> <200404281158.06331.ringworm@inbox.lv>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Apr 28, 2004, at 2:58 PM, Michael C. Shultz wrote: > My opinion is just as long as there is a stable postfix in > mail/postfix ( no > version number ) I could care less if there are also mail/postfix1 > mail/postfix3 etc... > I guess I'm more looking to see if people would need a postfix20 port for whatever reason they have to stick to that version.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1A15A1DC-9947-11D8-B6E4-000A9578CFCC>