Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2015 08:36:00 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 156226] [lagg]: failover does not announce the failover to switch Message-ID: <bug-156226-2472-4DJ3b6b3ln@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-156226-2472@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-156226-2472@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=156226 --- Comment #13 from eugen@grosbein.net --- (In reply to weberge42 from comment #12) > each switch has different default and miniumum values Yes, and one should not depend on default values but configure switches as required. > But what if you can't (or not allowed) to change this settings ? Too bad for you if you have manageable equipment but can't manage it. > I just don't see any relationship between manual ifconfig in case of a failover. Can you please elaborate this a bit more ? Maybe i'm missing something. In case of "non-manual" failure physical link goes down generally and corresponding switch changes its FIB at once. If one connects redundant layer-2 links to different switches, one should use some kind of signalling protocol like RSTP. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-156226-2472-4DJ3b6b3ln>