Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 13:48:59 +0100 From: Frank Staals <frank@fstaals.net> To: Volodymyr Kostyrko <c.kworr@gmail.com> Cc: Erich Dollansky <erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com>, Matthias Apitz <guru@unixarea.de>, "questions@FreeBSD.org" <questions@FreeBSD.org>, Mannase Nyathi <mannase@cipherwave.co.za> Subject: Re: SSH on FreeBSD Message-ID: <87wqvefw78.fsf@Shanna.FStaals.net> In-Reply-To: <50F54E40.9090406@gmail.com> (Volodymyr Kostyrko's message of "Tue, 15 Jan 2013 14:40:32 %2B0200") References: <sbmp-dontrebrand-1Tv3TH-0001qu-44-mannase@cipherwave.co.za> <64344677AECE934682A4243703F508681E09737D@CW-EXCH01.cipherwave.local> <20130115174536.78ecf7e3@X220.ovitrap.com> <20130115105006.GA2291@tiny.Sisis.de> <50F54E40.9090406@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Volodymyr Kostyrko <c.kworr@gmail.com> writes: > <snip> > In FreeBSD there are two ways of enabling sshd: default, fast and easy through > rc.conf and a bit tricky and secure via inetd.conf. Everyone can select their > own poison. I personally prefer the latter one. You seem to imply that enabling sshd through inetd is more secure than directly through rc.conf. Care to elaborate on that? Regards, -- - Frank
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?87wqvefw78.fsf>