Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 13:22:10 -0800 (PST) From: Sam Leffler <sam@FreeBSD.org> To: Perforce Change Reviews <perforce@freebsd.org> Subject: PERFORCE change 40779 for review Message-ID: <200310292122.h9TLMA89057278@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
http://perforce.freebsd.org/chv.cgi?CH=40779 Change 40779 by sam@sam_ebb on 2003/10/29 13:21:44 avoid recursive lock by unlocking before calling rtrequest; this is a bandaid to validate the problem--a proper fix is more involved Affected files ... .. //depot/projects/netperf/sys/net/route.c#20 edit Differences ... ==== //depot/projects/netperf/sys/net/route.c#20 (text+ko) ==== @@ -684,11 +684,12 @@ */ rt2 = rtalloc1(dst, 0, RTF_PRCLONING); if (rt2 && rt2->rt_parent) { + RT_UNLOCK(rt2); /* XXX recursive lock */ rtrequest(RTM_DELETE, rt_key(rt2), rt2->rt_gateway, rt_mask(rt2), rt2->rt_flags, 0); - RTFREE_LOCKED(rt2); + RTFREE(rt2); rn = rnh->rnh_addaddr(ndst, netmask, rnh, rt->rt_nodes); } else if (rt2) {
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200310292122.h9TLMA89057278>