Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2000 14:15:43 +0000 From: Josef Karthauser <joe@pavilion.net> To: Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com> Cc: "Matthew N. Dodd" <winter@jurai.net>, "Matthew N. Dodd" <mdodd@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: How often to commit? (was: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/isa if_ex.c) Message-ID: <20000116141543.B42244@florence.pavilion.net> In-Reply-To: <20000116105331.L1938@mojave.worldwide.lemis.com> References: <20000115130818.G349@mojave.worldwide.lemis.com> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0001151352220.462-100000@sasami.jurai.net> <20000116105331.L1938@mojave.worldwide.lemis.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Jan 16, 2000 at 10:53:31AM +0530, Greg Lehey wrote: > On Saturday, 15 January 2000 at 13:55:52 -0500, Matthew N. Dodd wrote: > > In general, the replies I've seen so far tend to confirm my opinion > that the middle ground is better than either extreme, but I'm open to > further discussion. > Would it be an idea to derive a style guide for commit messages as well? It occurs to me that it would be really useful if a bug fix contained the tag [bugfix] and a feature addition contained [feature], or logical equivalent. Joe -- Josef Karthauser FreeBSD: Take the red pill and we'll show you just how Technical Manager deep the rabbit hole goes. (http://www.uk.freebsd.org) Pavilion Internet plc. [joe@pavilion.net, joe@freebsd.org, joe@tao.org.uk] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000116141543.B42244>