Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 17:54:06 +0200 From: meka <meka@softhome.net> To: FreeBSD <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: New kind of ports Message-ID: <20050625175406.688ddefc.meka@softhome.net> In-Reply-To: <1119712377.716.29.camel@dirk.no.domain> References: <20050625171055.1505c9fa.meka@softhome.net> <1119712377.716.29.camel@dirk.no.domain>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 26 Jun 2005 01:12:57 +1000 Sam Lawrance <boris@brooknet.com.au> wrote: > In that case you want 'make checksum'. See the 'ports' manpage. Maybe I didn't express my self right. How about the (meta) rule fetch: checksum || do-fetch > I'm not sure what you're after here, perhaps misc/porteasy or > devel/portcheckout will do what you want. I didn't test portcheckout, but make as a program work like "satisfy dependencies first, and then the rule". So, this is why I said ports system works weird. I hope you got it. I know my english is not so good, but I hope you know what I want to gain. > -Sam -- Pinguin? Daemon? Fish? Dragon fly? Grow up. Windows are the future, daemons and animals are for fairy tales.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050625175406.688ddefc.meka>