Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 13:02:56 +0000 From: Florent Thoumie <flz@FreeBSD.org> To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Romain_Tarti=E8re?= <romain@blogreen.org> Cc: freebsd-mono@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [BSD#] mono-2.2 branched Message-ID: <a01628140902240502i71d0e791h80e32bb29d489adb@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20090224110648.GA69621@blogreen.org> References: <20090127193853.GA81830@blogreen.org> <a01628140902230051m335d386fk9d0a0ad7366dda5@mail.gmail.com> <20090224110648.GA69621@blogreen.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 11:06 AM, Romain Tarti=E8re <romain@blogreen.org> w= rote: > Hi > > On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 08:51:08AM +0000, Florent Thoumie wrote: >> How far are we from getting mono 2.2 into CVS? Is it ready for general >> consumption? > As of today, mono-2.2 works smoothly (at least on my computer) however a > few regression tests don't pass and bugs have been reported in Novell's > bugzilla regarding them. > > These bugs are still open and no fix nor workaround is provided yet. =A0I > unfortunately don't have time to investigate this myself right now :-( > > So we decided not not to push 2.2 yet. =A0It would be interesting to have > feedback from people tracking the releng_2.2 branch to know whether > everything works as expected for them or not. > These two failing test are reported not to work with mono 2.4. Is it the case with 2.2 as well? --=20 Florent Thoumie flz@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD Committer
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?a01628140902240502i71d0e791h80e32bb29d489adb>