Date: Tue, 2 Mar 1999 18:49:24 -0800 (PST) From: asami@freebsd.org (Satoshi Asami) To: garyj@muc.de Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: all those .la files Message-ID: <199903030249.SAA36437@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> In-Reply-To: <199903021952.UAA00615@peedub.muc.de> (message from Gary Jennejohn on Tue, 02 Mar 1999 20:52:47 %2B0100)
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* From: Gary Jennejohn <garyj@peedub.muc.de> * * Chuck Robey writes: * >And the reasons that I don't want FreeBSD to require libtool are: : * >I want libtool to go away, so I can't get behind any effort to add it. * > * * hear, hear ! Everytime I install a port which uses libtool I have to go in * and edit the damned thing because it always screws up setting PATH. A royal * PITA. Sorry if I'm smoking something wierd here, but I thought the original proposal is to have ports come with their own libtool to use ports/devel/libtool. That way we only need to fix one broken port instead of dozens, no? :) Satoshi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199903030249.SAA36437>