Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 16:21:14 -0400 From: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> To: Dimitry Andric <dimitry@andric.com> Cc: svn-src-stable@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-stable-7@freebsd.org, Kip Macy <kmacy@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r192590 - stable/7/sys/sys Message-ID: <200905221621.15507.jhb@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <4A17063F.60303@andric.com> References: <200905221754.n4MHs3cr014003@svn.freebsd.org> <200905221507.39476.jhb@freebsd.org> <4A17063F.60303@andric.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Friday 22 May 2009 4:08:31 pm Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 2009-05-22 21:07, John Baldwin wrote: > >> Log: > >> some ports erroneously use the existence of AT_FDCWD to check for > >> the availability of the *at system calls so s/AT_FDCWD/AT_FDCWD_notyet/g > >> > >> Reported by: Dimitry Andric > > > > I wonder if it wouldn't be appropriate to just remove the dirfd bits entirely > > from 7.x for now. I.e. remove NDINIT_AT(), AT_FDCWD_notyet, the 'dirfd' > > member from the structure, the 'dirfd' parameter from NDINIT_ALL(), etc. ZFS > > only really needed NDINIT_ATVP(), yes? > > Are there any plans to MFC the *at() calls? (I'd guess not, since it > looks like they change the ABI...) I don't think there are due to the ABI change, and if they were ever MFC'd, the NDINIT, etc. bits could be restored as part of that merge. -- John Baldwin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200905221621.15507.jhb>