Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 6 Aug 2007 11:04:22 +0200
From:      Roman Divacky <rdivacky@freebsd.org>
To:        Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net>
Cc:        emulation@freebsd.org, freebsd-jail@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Is it safe to change compat.linux.osrelease inside a jail?
Message-ID:  <20070806090422.GA47161@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <20070806093303.axopv21aw0ckowco@webmail.leidinger.net>
References:  <45722684@bsam.ru> <20070806093303.axopv21aw0ckowco@webmail.leidinger.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 09:33:03AM +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> Quoting Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru> (from Sat, 04 Aug 2007 00:00:35 
> +0400):
> 
> >Hi!
> >
> >
> >I'm porting some Fedora Core 6 applications. Since the FreeBSD
> >package of a FC6 port should be build with non-default
> >compat.linux.osrelease and pointyhat is using jails to create
> >packages, here is the question at the Subject.
> >
> >I know it _may_ be changed (I've tried and succeeded). Can someone
> >say that it's quite OK to do so (without bad effects to jail/host)?
> >Sure I ask about -CURRENT.
> 
> Roman did some work to make this a per-jail feature. I haven't seen  
> any obvious stuff in the code which would make using this a bad idea.  
> So: there are no known side-effects to use this in a jail.

I didnt do anything.. this has always been per-jail attribute :)



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070806090422.GA47161>