Date: Sat, 31 Jul 1999 12:36:38 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@NUXI.com> To: Archie Cobbs <archie@whistle.com> Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: skip port Message-ID: <19990731123638.A16992@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <199907311911.MAA64004@bubba.whistle.com>; from Archie Cobbs on Sat, Jul 31, 1999 at 12:11:27PM -0700 References: <19990731103045.A89293@dragon.nuxi.com> <199907311911.MAA64004@bubba.whistle.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > Sounds like the ``BROKEN='' needs to be wrapped by ${OSVERSION}.
>
> Been there, done that, doesn't work.
.include <bsd.port.pre.mk>
.if ${OSVERSION} >= 4
BROKEN='dev_t issues'
.endif
.
.
.include <bsd.port.post.mk>
> Moreover, I thought ports were only supposed to be accurate for -current.. ?
Not in the least. I am not sure why people think this. Ports are most
importantly buildable and working for -STABLE, since that will become the
release and we want good packages on the CDROM.
Ports stopped tracking -CURRENT to tracking -STABLE in 1997. Since
Satoshi now has a build farm, and uses a chrooted build environment,
ports track both (more or less).
--
-- David (obrien@NUXI.com -or- obrien@FreeBSD.org)
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990731123638.A16992>