Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 10:18:30 +0100 From: "Klaus T. Aehlig" <aehlig@linta.de> To: Stephen Montgomery-Smith <stephen@missouri.edu> Cc: "ports@FreeBSD.org" <ports@freebsd.org>, Stas Timokhin <devel@stasyan.com>, ade@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libtool issues Message-ID: <20110620091828.GA16267@curry.linta.de> In-Reply-To: <4DFEE295.3090204@missouri.edu> References: <4DFEE295.3090204@missouri.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dear Stephen,
> Or one could instead modify devel/libtools, maybe something like this.
> Rename bin/libtool to libexec/libtool.sh, and then rewrite the libtool
> script as something like:
>
> #!/bin/sh
> PREFIX=/usr/local
> TEMPCCDIR=`mktemp -d -t /tmp`
> export PATH=${WRKDIR}:$PATH
> ${LN} -s ${LOCALBASE}/bin/${CC} ${TEMPCCDIR}/cc
> ${LN} -s ${LOCALBASE}/bin/${CXX} ${TEMPCCDIR}/c++
> ${PREFIX}/libexec/libtool.sh $@
> rm -r ${TEMPCCDIR}
besides the obvious point that ${TMPCCDIR} should be under ${WRKDIR}, I'm
getting nervous reading ${LOCALBASE}/bin/${CC} which seems to assume that
${CC} is the name of a binary to be found in ${LOCALBASE}/bin; this might
well be if libtool is used in conjunction with USE_GCC -- but are you sure
that this will always be the case? devel/libtool does not have such a dependency,
and if using ccache (as I do on my machines) you get something like
/usr/ports/devel/libtool>make -V CC
/usr/local/libexec/ccache/world/cc
/usr/ports/devel/libtool>
Am I missing something which makes your suggested changes to devel/libtool still
save?
Best,
Klaus
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110620091828.GA16267>