Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 13:17:51 +0000 From: "Igor Mozolevsky" <igor@hybrid-lab.co.uk> To: "Ivan Voras" <ivoras@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: When will ZFS become stable? Message-ID: <a2b6592c0801070517n3d95be19ke9ddb22bb277d723@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <9bbcef730801070230k14f6x567c8caf75d4944d@mail.gmail.com> References: <fll63b$j1c$1@ger.gmane.org> <20080107095952.GA25096@garage.freebsd.pl> <9bbcef730801070230k14f6x567c8caf75d4944d@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 07/01/2008, Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> wrote: > Your comment that people are panicking more than ZFS is correct, but > that illustrates the importance people give to having file system not > crash on them :) Having read the thread and people's reasons for using the ZFS, it does seem that they are trying to use ZFS to solve non-problem problems, especially that someone commented that they use 1:10 kmem:HD space ratio! Igor :-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?a2b6592c0801070517n3d95be19ke9ddb22bb277d723>