Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 6 Nov 1998 15:10:11 -0800 (PST)
From:      asami@FreeBSD.ORG (Satoshi Asami)
To:        billf@chc-chimes.com
Cc:        freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: bsd.port.mk updates and such
Message-ID:  <199811062310.PAA10066@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.HPP.3.96.981104150505.19007G-100000@hp9000.chc-chimes.com> (message from Bill Fumerola on Wed, 4 Nov 1998 16:15:08 -0500 (EST))

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
 * problem:
 * 
 * As anyone who follows this list and the ports PR's knows, people not
 * having an updated bsd.port.mk is the cause of a LOT of problems for
 * people. The inability to update this file is caused by several reasons:

It is caused by people not reading instructions (or instructions not
being clear).  The only way to track ports-current (aka ports-stable)
is to update your world regularly or use the upgrade kits.

Stuffing bsd.port.mk in with the ports collection doesn't solve the
problem.  There are ldconfig updates, install-info updates (just to
name a few) that have broken things in the past.

 * 	I track -STABLE on a p75 overdrive, needless to say, I don't build
 * world everytime there is a change in -STABLE. Though I _could_ (cd
 * /usr/src/share/mk/ && make install) or add a cron to do that, I don't, and
 * we can't expect everyone else to either.

Get the upgrade kit! :)

Seriously, this is just a case of user misconception.  Just doing
"make install" in src/share/mk is not enough.  Ports-current is NOT
guaranteed to work with the most recent release.  What we need to fix
is the documentation.

Satoshi

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199811062310.PAA10066>