Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 20:43:22 +0200 From: sam <samira.nox@gmail.com> To: "Adrian Chadd" <adrian@freebsd.org> Cc: "freebsd-current@freebsd.org" <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Wireless: AzureWave 2100 supported? Message-ID: <op.wf9nmkb1ufp0mi@noxon> In-Reply-To: <CAJ-VmonDeqrDwVNMR7K1TbxatBssV9j6FUW37cipT_mJZ2wAxQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <op.wf7zdqd7ufp0mi@noxon> <CAJ-VmonDeqrDwVNMR7K1TbxatBssV9j6FUW37cipT_mJZ2wAxQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi That's a shame. But I look forward to test it, if you get the time, to = work on it. mfg sam Am 20.06.2012, 23:09 Uhr, schrieb Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>: > Hi, > > > On 20 June 2012 14:02, sam <samira.nox@gmail.com> wrote: > >> or if you prefer pciconf: >> none12@pci0:8:0:0: class=3D0x028000 card=3D0x21001a3b chip=3D0x0= 037168c >> rev=3D0x01 hdr=3D0x00 >> vendor =3D 'Atheros Communications Inc.' >> class =3D network > > 0x168c is Atheros. > > 0x0037 looks like some kind of AR93xx derivative. There's currently no= > support in ath(4) and ath_hal(4) for the AR93xx or later chips. > > I have some rough plans to start supporting that when I get some time > but I'm very short on time right now and I'm mostly trying to focus on= > testing and tidying up the existing driver code before I bring over > AR93xx support. > > Sorry, I can't give you any further help than that. > > > Adrian -- = Erstellt mit Operas revolution=C3=A4rem E-Mail-Modul: http://www.opera.c= om/mail/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?op.wf9nmkb1ufp0mi>