Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 23:17:17 +0100 From: Csaba Henk <csaba-ml@creo.hu> To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@des.no> Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [RFC] Remove NTFS kernel support Message-ID: <20080218221716.GI49155@beastie.creo.hu> In-Reply-To: <86d4qu43rt.fsf@ds4.des.no> References: <slrnfqrp6g.i6j.csaba-ml@beastie.creo.hu> <867ihdc34c.fsf@ds4.des.no> <20080212190207.GB49155@beastie.creo.hu> <86d4r2540f.fsf@ds4.des.no> <20080213165923.GD49155@beastie.creo.hu> <86zlu493ep.fsf@ds4.des.no> <20080214101511.GE49155@beastie.creo.hu> <20080214182740.GZ64299@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> <20080218153717.GH49155@beastie.creo.hu> <86d4qu43rt.fsf@ds4.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 05:40:06PM +0100, Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav wrote: > Csaba Henk <csaba-ml@creo.hu> writes: > > Peter Jeremy <peterjeremy@optushome.com.au> writes: > > > Csaba Henk <csaba-ml@creo.hu> writes: > > > > yes, why so? FreeBSD has embraced recently a big chunk of CDDL'd > > > > code without making much fuss about licensing [...] > > > If you're talking about either dtrace or ZFS: > > > [...] > > > 2) It is not part of the GENERIC system and will remain optional due to > > > the license. > > It smells like apples and oranges to me... GENERIC is the name of the > > default configuration for the _kernel_, isnt'it? > > Correct. It was *you* who brought up the issue of CDDL code in the > kernel. Peter pointed out, very correctly, that the code in question is > not included in the default kernel. Umm, I don't mean to nit-pick, but I thought of the CDDL code in userspace... Sorry if I was ambiguous. Csaba
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080218221716.GI49155>