Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 10:19:10 -0700 From: Garrett Cooper <gcooper@FreeBSD.org> To: Garrett Cooper <gcooper@freebsd.org> Cc: Rui Paulo <rpaulo@gmail.com>, "arch@freebsd.org" <arch@freebsd.org>, "current@freebsd.org" <current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Removal of ICC (intel compiler) bits from mk Message-ID: <AANLkTi=kEH3SSA4A76iWt77MxKRbDXPbPo-%2BY2oCn0Po@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimCdcBvgBt1sr2y1_=6fOEGWFFxa=hRwQ5vzyhT@mail.gmail.com> References: <E604222D-A731-4F0E-BF21-FF7F4306A899@gmail.com> <AANLkTimCdcBvgBt1sr2y1_=6fOEGWFFxa=hRwQ5vzyhT@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 10:18 AM, Garrett Cooper <gcooper@freebsd.org> wrot= e: > On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 9:23 AM, Rui Paulo <rpaulo@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi, >> I've been chatting with the ICC ex-users and they seem to be ok with the= removal of the ICC bits from share/mk and other places. >> The reason is that it doesn't work and no one has volunteered to fix it = for many years. This seems to indicate that the interest in ICC is low. >> If there's anyone against this, speak now or forever be silent. :-) > > =A0 =A0Later versions of icc are more gcc compliant aren't they? If so, Sorry -- wrong term. s/compliant/compatible/ :). > wouldn't this also be a non-issue to remove the bits, or are there > still some incompatibilities between gcc and icc that are worth > noting? > Thanks, > -Garrett >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTi=kEH3SSA4A76iWt77MxKRbDXPbPo-%2BY2oCn0Po>