Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2001 23:54:54 +1300 From: "Dan Langille" <dan@langille.org> To: Mike Meyer <mwm@mired.org> Cc: freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Renaming standard-supfile? Message-ID: <200103091054.f29Assw87201@ns1.unixathome.org> In-Reply-To: <15016.36485.390431.9980@guru.mired.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 9 Mar 2001, at 2:04, Mike Meyer wrote: > Given that we've got stable-supfile, "current-supfile" seems like an > obvious choice. It would certainly solve the problem. Sounds like a very good idea. We keep seeing that problem in the IRC channels too. Is there any good reason for naming it "standard-supfile"? I don't think we should worry about catering for the experienced among us. It's the newbies that this catches out. -- Dan Langille pgpkey - finger dan@unixathome.org | http://unixathome.org/finger.php got any work? I'm looking for some. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200103091054.f29Assw87201>