Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 23:38:29 +0000 From: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> To: Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com> Cc: Nate Williams <nate@yogotech.com>, Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>, Dominic Marks <dominic_marks@btinternet.com>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, Dion Johnson <dionj@caldera.com> Subject: Re: FreeBSD-1.X public cvs? Message-ID: <20020129233829.A2112@chiark.greenend.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20020130100520.E54159@wantadilla.lemis.com>; from grog@lemis.com on Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 10:05:20AM %2B1030 References: <20020130100520.E54159@wantadilla.lemis.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 10:05:20AM +1030, Greg Lehey wrote: > Nate Williams <nate@yogotech.com> wrote: > > > > Thanks. I'm going to wait and see what happens w/regards to the > > talking heads on this, and if the consensus is that it's legal to > > post, I'll upload the bits to freefall. > > It's legal. Here's the original message. I'm also copying Dion > Johnson. Dion, as I'm sure you're aware, we took the FreeBSD 1.x > sources offline because they were "tainted" with AT&T code. Now that > 32V is free, there should be no further problem releasing them, right? What about <http://minnie.tuhs.org/pipermail/tuhs/2002-January/000028.html>; which concerns the Berkeley patches to the AT&T code? Tony. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020129233829.A2112>