Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2014 17:22:34 +0400 From: Dmitry Marakasov <amdmi3@amdmi3.ru> To: Tijl Coosemans <tijl@FreeBSD.org> Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, marino@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r366349 - head/archivers/rpm4 Message-ID: <20140829132234.GI34677@hades.panopticon> In-Reply-To: <20140829135928.28caa5f3@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> References: <201408272042.s7RKgFqF074882@svn.freebsd.org> <20140828101134.6f7b01ee@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <20140828102214.GH34677@hades.panopticon> <20140828142822.73c5cef4@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <20140829100025.GQ55025@hades.panopticon> <540051CF.7000301@marino.st> <20140829111457.GA2149@hades.panopticon> <20140829135928.28caa5f3@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Tijl Coosemans (tijl@FreeBSD.org) wrote: > >>> Strange, poudriere doesn't complain on these any more (no, I haven't > >>> used non-default prefix). So I've removed them. > >>> > >>> And yes, @dirrmtry should've been used here. Regarding directories > >>> shared by multiple ports, I still don't have clear understanding: > >>> on one hand, if a directory is managed by dependency, it shouldn't > >>> appear in the port plist. On the other hand, if a port is installed > >>> with non-default prefix, it should manage all dirs it uses on its > >>> own. I probably would prefer the latter as it's more flexible and > >>> less error prone (what if dependent ports plist change and directory > >>> is no longer shared). > >> > >> if the directory is provided by a dependency 100% of the cases, then it > >> shouldn't be in pkg-plist because it will try-fail 100% of the time. > > > > As I've said, this 100% is unreliable as it may change sometime > > > >> The non-standard prefix isn't an issue because all ports will have the > >> same non-standard prefix. There's no difference. > > > > No, just an individual port may be installed with non-standard prefix > > (while dependencies remain in standard one). > > I think pkg will handle directories automatically once pkg_install has > been removed. Only empty directories and directories with special > permissions will have to be listed in pkg-plist then. That would be great. -- Dmitry Marakasov . 55B5 0596 FF1E 8D84 5F56 9510 D35A 80DD F9D2 F77D amdmi3@amdmi3.ru ..: jabber: amdmi3@jabber.ru http://www.amdmi3.ru
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140829132234.GI34677>