Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 09:03:29 -0600 From: Steve Randall <srandall52@gmail.com> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [CFT] cpu stresser^W libreoffice 3.3.0 final Message-ID: <20110202090329.7ee4a4ab@locust.local> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimyB5kw4eKOZEH2xCQX5Hz8OMxSiDHHPnO=df5t@mail.gmail.com> References: <AANLkTinCUuWET3dFVzpTRPfAiqG7hfdPJrAxY=OWVxff@mail.gmail.com> <20110202153805.40db05f8@gmail.com> <AANLkTimyB5kw4eKOZEH2xCQX5Hz8OMxSiDHHPnO=df5t@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 2 Feb 2011 15:13:01 +0100 Baptiste Daroussin <baptiste.daroussin@gmail.com> wrote: > 2011/2/2 Sergey V. Dyatko <sergey.dyatko@gmail.com>: > > On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 15:06:06 +0100 > > Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > >> Hi all > >> > >> I ported libreoffice 3.3.0, you can find it here: > >> http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/libreoffice.shar or > >> http://git.etoilebsd.net/ports/tree/libreoffice > >> > >> Can you please test it? > >> > >> by default it builds without java. it only lacks kde and gnome > >> integration. (sorry but my poor CPU already hates enough :)) > >> > >> All languages supported are build. > >> > >> I try to avoid as much as possible bundled libraries which gives a > >> pretty fast compiling libreoffice (on a Q6600: ~2h without java, ~3h30 > >> with java) > >> > >> at this points : > >> there is (I guess) only one remaining problem : > >> which launching libreoffice it can't find it libraries, I haven't > >> decided yet wether to add LD_LIBRARY_PATH to the wrapper script or to > >> add ldconfig -m ${PREFIX}/lib/libreoffice/ure/lib and ldconfig -m > >> ${PREFIX}/lib/libreoffice/base3.3/program > >> > >> maybe it conflicts with openoffice I haven't checked yet. > >> > >> to test it you will need a fresh ports tree (the needed libtextcat > >> modification was committed yesterday thanks thierry@) > >> > >> the mandatory screenshot : > >> http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/libreoffice-3.3.0-final.png > >> > >> I expect to be able to push it in the tree during next week (after > >> finding a good way to deal with the libraries and checked if it > >> conflicts with openoffice) > >> > >> I would like to thanks Robert Nagy from openbsd, he has made all the > >> hard work :), he was also very helpful. > >> > > > > Thanks for work! I second that. > > > > I have one comment: > > > > [tiger@tiger]~%pkg_info -xI libreo > > libreoffice-3.3.0 =C2=A0 Full integrated office productivity suite > > > > now I'm trying `pkg_create -b libreoffice-3.3.0` but got errors: > > > > tiger# pkg_create -b libreoffice-3.3.0 > > tar: lib/libreoffice/basis3.3/program/basprovfx.uno.so: Cannot stat: No > > such file or directory > > tar: > > lib/libreoffice/basis3.3/program/deploymentfx.uno.so: Cannot stat: No > > such file or directory > > > > [tiger@tiger]~%pkg_info -xL libreo |grep basprovfx.uno.so > > /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/basis3.3/program/basprovfx.uno.so > > > > [tiger@tiger]~%file /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/basis3.3/program/basprov= fx.uno.so > > /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/basis3.3/program/basprovfx.uno.so: cannot > > open `/usr/local/lib/libreoffice/basis3.3/program/basprovfx.uno.so' (No > > such file or directory) > > > > tiger# find work/ -type f -name basprovfx.uno.so > > tiger# pwd > > /usr/ports/editors/libreoffice > > > > broken pkg-plist ? > > > >> regards, > >> Bapt > > > > -- > > wbr, tiger > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > >=20 > seems like but I really don't know how to figure out what you have or > have not in your box that prevent basprovfx.uno.so and consors to be > built Have you tried building on i386? It looks like you generated the packing list on amd64. I'm not sure if that explains basprovfx.uno.so, but it's definitely a problem.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110202090329.7ee4a4ab>