Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2005 02:46:35 +0900 From: Hajimu UMEMOTO <ume@freebsd.org> To: Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org> Cc: current@freebsd.org, nectar@freebsd.org, standards@freebsd.org, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org, Dag-Erling =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= <des@des.no>, "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> Subject: Re: [CFR] correct type of addrinfo.ai_addrlen and netent.n_net Message-ID: <yger7fni8zo.wl%ume@mahoroba.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.43.0505311248570.3368-100000@sea.ntplx.net> References: <86fyw32yqm.fsf@xps.des.no> <Pine.GSO.4.43.0505311248570.3368-100000@sea.ntplx.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi,
>>>>> On Tue, 31 May 2005 12:51:00 -0400 (EDT)
>>>>> Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org> said:
deischen> And sometimes we put padding in place to allow for expansion
deischen> (ucontext for one). I think the padding should stay. If we
deischen> ever get symbol versioning, then you can remove it without
deischen> having to bump library versions.
Since there are the padding only in 64 bit arch, I think we cannot use
them for such purpose.
Sincerely,
--
Hajimu UMEMOTO @ Internet Mutual Aid Society Yokohama, Japan
ume@mahoroba.org ume@{,jp.}FreeBSD.org
http://www.imasy.org/~ume/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?yger7fni8zo.wl%ume>