Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2000 20:36:03 -0500 From: Krzysztof Parzyszek <kparz@cs.iastate.edu> To: Doug Barton <DougB@gorean.org> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Load averages Message-ID: <20000925203603.A10466@buchanan-181-249.stures.iastate> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0009251650450.10846-100000@dt051n37.san.rr.com>; from DougB@gorean.org on Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 04:52:07PM -0700 References: <20000925183854.A10200@buchanan-181-249.stures.iastate> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0009251650450.10846-100000@dt051n37.san.rr.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 04:52:07PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > > Yup. There are some issues with load average in -current right now > related to the SMPng code that produce the same symptoms, which is why I > mentioned it. So now the question is, what do tools like top, ps, systat, > etc. say? top actually said a lot... It turned out that iplog was consuming 98% of processor's time. Another question is: why? Anyway, I killed it and restarted it again and it runs fine now. I don't know why I didn't see it before... -- , The power . Any sufficiently advan- dP to serve 7b Krzysztof Parzyszek .----> ced bug is indistingui- (8b ____ d8) --------------------+----> shable from a feature. `88bo8FBSD8od88' hektor@iname.com `----> -- Rich Kulawiec To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000925203603.A10466>