Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2010 23:57:30 +0300 From: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> To: sbruno@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: [patch and review please] 64 CPU Support Message-ID: <20100725205730.GG22295@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> In-Reply-To: <1280090933.14823.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <20100722213836.GH15227@martini.nu> <1279836216.2456.14.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20100723003611.GA66678@martini.nu> <7573B69C-3C37-449A-A27F-5B0B2ED84757@mac.com> <1280090933.14823.2.camel@localhost.localdomain>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--GdbWtwDHkcXqP16f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 01:48:53PM -0700, Sean Bruno wrote: > Reposting from -stable. =20 >=20 > Kind of a large patch, but in order to make an omlette, you need to > break a few servers. >=20 > This is a diff against -CURRENT, not stable-8 as I didn't get a chance > to test it. It is directly based off of changes that peter@ made to the > Yahoo FreeBSD 7 tree. >=20 > I have compile and boot tested this on my local machines, but I don't > have 64 CPU machines to test upon. >=20 > Sean >=20 Very low-priority comment (I looked at the patch at the time it was posted to stable@). Nice thing about the patch is that it presumably identifies all the places that depend on the wideness of the cpu mask. Would it make sense to abstract the cpumask operations with some macros to not repeat the search for the places when 64 will be too narrow again ? --GdbWtwDHkcXqP16f Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkxMpToACgkQC3+MBN1Mb4iJzACg6lC6oHSjxu7+952Y+hrD8lAR t9cAn3fUeXqSqBTGgD7lgnlt0weeDaI8 =k6LT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --GdbWtwDHkcXqP16f--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100725205730.GG22295>