Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 06 Jul 2011 07:10:06 -0700
From:      Matt <sendtomatt@gmail.com>
To:        Sevan / Venture37 <venture37@gmail.com>
Cc:        freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: RT2860/RT3090/RAL: Any brave testers?
Message-ID:  <4E146CBE.50606@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA%2BU3Mf589HM7-=S_42sPsT4xSoeJ3X7X0=DEfw44gcQ4-O40wQ@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <4E13F39E.1000302@gmail.com> <CA%2BU3Mf589HM7-=S_42sPsT4xSoeJ3X7X0=DEfw44gcQ4-O40wQ@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 07/06/11 02:10, Sevan / Venture37 wrote:
> On 6 July 2011 06:33, Matt<sendtomatt@gmail.com>  wrote:
>> I've been working on combing ral&  Alexandr Egorenkov's rt2860. It runs fine
>> here (LiteOn v0x1814 d0x3090), and compiles sans complaint with both clang
>> and gcc.
>>
>> However, I haven't tested any other rt2860/3090 devices, or traditional ral
>> devices (they should be the same, changes only to allow rt2860 attach).
>>
>> If anyone has a device with a ralink chipset, and wants to test a
>> development quality wireless driver :), please let know.
>>
>> Diffs against CVS
>> /usr/src/sys/modules/ral/Makefile: http://pastebin.com/cgHy3SXL
>> /usr/src/sys/dev/ral: http://pastebin.com/wXHd7fG9
>>
>> Please let me know if there is better way to distribute or if you'd like a
>> tarball. There are still some spurious printfs on attach about HT/WifiN...I
>> think they can be ignored.
>>
>> This is not a production driver. Please use for testing only. There is
>> definitely work to be done. If you test it, and it works for you (esp. LEDs,
>> HT, injection, hostap etc.) let me know.
>>
>> Thanks!
>> Matt
> Hi Matt,
> Will happily do so, my card details are here
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2011-April/024019.html
>
>
> Sevan / Venture37
>
You may have some deja vu...from usage/performance perspective it is 
quite similar to the rt2860 driver although merged into ral :).

Please don't worry about LNA gain printf or (possibly) extension channel 
errors...I think these are excessively verbose, but I am still comparing 
to OpenBSD version's initialization.

Thanks!
Matt



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4E146CBE.50606>