Date: Wed, 24 Apr 1996 21:09:53 +0100 From: "Gary Palmer" <gpalmer@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Sujal Patel <smpatel@umiacs.umd.edu> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: request for a new "feature" as regards DDB Message-ID: <3751.830376593@palmer.demon.co.uk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 22 Apr 1996 18:02:56 EDT." <Pine.NEB.3.92.960422180106.209p-100000@xi.dorm.umd.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Sujal Patel wrote in message ID <Pine.NEB.3.92.960422180106.209p-100000@xi.dorm.umd.edu>: > While we're talking about DDB, can't we have it timeout in 30s if you > don't hit a key (and then generate a core dump). Not really ... that would assume that the IRQ handlers were still operational, which may not be the case. DDB should only be running if all interrupts are disabled if I remember right (and if I don't, I won't mind being corrected :-) ) Gary -- Gary Palmer FreeBSD Core Team Member FreeBSD - Turning PC's into workstations. See http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/ for info.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3751.830376593>